Monthly Archives: November 2013

11 November 2013: ICT-1 Daily Summary – Hartal Coverage of Motiur Rahman Nizami; Contempt proceedings against Fakhrul Islam, Defense Counsel for Salauddin Qader Chowdhury

Today the Tribunal heard matters in the following cases:

  1. Chief Prosecutor vs. Motiur Rahman Nizami
  2. Chief Prosecutor vs. Salauddin Qader Chowdhury

Today was set for the submission of the Defense closing arguments. However, due to another hartal, the senior Defense Counsels who were supposed to make the Defense submissions were absent at the Tribunal. Junior Defense Counsel once again submitted an application seeking adjournment on the grounds of “personal difficulties.” The Tribunal agreed to adjourn the proceedings once again until, 12 November 2013.

In the contempt proceedings against Fakhrul Islam, Defense Counsel of Salauddin Qader Chowdhury, today was set for his appearance. However, Fakhrul Islam was not present at the Tribunal, and his junior appeared on his behalf, seeking adjournment for two months. The Tribunal agreed to adjourn the proceedings of the case until 26 November 2013.

10 November 2013: ICT-1 Daily Summary – Hartal Coverage of Motiur Rahman Nizami

Today the Tribunal heard matters in the following case:

  1. Chief Prosecutor vs. Motiur Rahman Nizami

Today was set for the submission of the Defense closing arguments. However, due to another hartal, the senior Defense Counsels who were supposed to make the Defense submissions were absent at the Tribunal. Junior Defense Counsel submitted an application seeking adjournment on the grounds of personal difficulties. It is notable that on Hartal days the Defense Counsels tend to seek adjournment on the ground of “personal difficulties” instead of mentioning the hartal.

The Tribunal agreed to adjourn the proceedings of the case until tomorrow, 11 November 2013.

10 November 2013: ICT-2 – Hartal Coverage of Syed Mohammad Qaisar, Charges Pressed by the Prosecution

Today the Tribunal heard matters in the following case:

  1. Chief Prosecutor vs. Syed Mohammad Qaisar

The BNP-led-18-party opposition alliance enforced a continuous 84-hour countrywide hartal from 10 November 2013 until 13  November 2013.  This marked the opposition’s longest continuous hartal after the Eid vacation, significantly slowing down the proceedings of the Tribunal. Due to the Hartal, our researcher could not safely travel to the Tribunal to be present in Court.  The following coverage was compiled from direct communication with Court officials, parties to the proceedings, and news coverage of the day’s events.

Despite the hartal, the Prosecution pressed a total of 18 charges against Syed Mohammad Qaisar who was under investigation for his wartime role and alleged involvement with the Rajakar forces and Peace Committee in the Habiganj area of greater Sylhet. The formal charges against Qaisar were submitted to the Registrar Office of the Tribunal by Prosecutor Tureen Afroz and Prosecutor Ziad Al Malum.

The 18 charges pressed against the accused include 11 incidents concerning his involvement in the killing of approximately 155 people, 2 incidents concerning rape, and 5 incidents involving abduction, looting, arson and miscellaneous other crimes. All of these incidents allegedly occured between April and November in 1971. Our researchers have thus far been unable to obtain a copy of the formal charges submitted.

Previously, on 5 August 2013, Qaisar was granted conditional bail by ICT-2, due to his health condition.

7 November 2013: ICT-2 Daily Summary – Mir Quasem Ali, Order transferring case back to ICT-1 for review; AKM Yusuf, PW-3

Today the Tribunal heard matters in the following cases:

  1. Chief Prosecutor vs. Mir Quasem Ali
  2. Chief Prosecutor vs. AKM Yusuf

Tribunal 2 passed an order today, sending the case of Mir Quasem Ali back to Tribunal 1 for disposal of an application filed on behalf of the Defense seeking review of the Charge Framing Order. The Charge Framing Order had been passed by Tribunal 1 on 5 September, 2013. The case was later transferred by Tribunal 1, propio motu, to Tribunal 2 on 30 September 2013. It appeared that a copy of the review application was never received by Tribunal 2 with the case records sent to them from Tribunal 1. Defense stressed that they had indeed filed the application on 17 September 2013, and the Prosecution acknowledged receipt of a copy of the same. Accordingly, the judges of Tribunal 2 were of the opinion that, since the Charge Framing Order had been passed by Tribunal 1, the review petition challenging the Charge Framing Order should also be heard and discharged by the same court. Accordingly, ICT-2 resolved to send the case records back to ICT-1. The case records will be transferred to ICT-1, exclusively for the purpose of reviewing the application.  The case will thereafter be sent back to Tribunal 2 for the commencement of trial. Continue reading →

7 November 2013: ICT-1 Daily Summary –Motiur Rahman Nizami, Defense Closing Arguments

Today the Tribunal heard matters in the following case:

  1. Chief Prosecutor vs. Motiur Rahman Nizami

In the case of Motiur Rahman Nizami, the Defense began closing arguments today. The Defense submissions focused on the testimony of PW-1, Misbahur Rahman Chowdhury, and PW-26, IO Abdur Razzak Khan.  Counsel also reviewed several  evidentiary exhibits. Thereafter, the Tribunal adjourned the proceedings in the case until 10 November 2013.

Closing Arguments of the Defense

The Defense acknowledged Motiur Rahman Nizami was the president of Pakistani Islami Chatra Sangha, student wing of Jamaat-e-Islami, until the end of September 1971, but they denied that Nizami was the chief of Al-Badars or involved with the activities of Al-Badr. The Defense further denied any involvement of the Accused in forming the Shanti (Peace) Committee, Razakars, Al-Badr, or Al-Shams. Continue reading →